Musings on Teaching at a Research School

I was on my school’s subreddit the other day, and I stumbled upon a thread where a student was frustrated by how little contact they had with their instructors, how little the instructors seemed to care about teaching, and how much was being left to TAs. Most of the responses in the thread were in agreement, with a few chiming in that this was a research school and professors were here to do research, so they were  literally not paid to care about teaching.

This is an issue that’s been bothering me more and more the older I’ve gotten. Yes, this is a research school. We faculty come here largely for our promise in research, and the recruitments in recent years haven’t even bothered to pretend there’s much beyond the potential for fundraising that’s a criterion in hiring.

But the issue really bothers me. First off, our salaries are paid from “hard money” (as opposed to “soft money,” which refers to grants), of which a large portion comes from tuition dollars. So even on a purely intellectual (and perhaps more than a little cynical) level, we should care about teaching because student tuition is critical to our bottom line.

But it’s really more than that. I teach large undergraduate courses more often than most in large part because  I love working with undergrads. Working with older teens and early-twenties students always breaks my heart a little because they are so brand new, moving in the world in these grownup bodies that might fool someone into thinking they’re actually adults when the reality is that they are so young, so largely clueless, so open and curious and hopeful, so vulnerable and apprehensive about the future. If you don’t appreciate what a privilege and responsibility it is to share your knowledge and excitement about your field with young people, if all you see is a hindrance to writing another proposal or taking another call from a program manager, if all the grading and office hours in your class are held by your TA, I’m sorry but what kind of teacher and person are you?

College is a formative experience for our students and we owe them our very best. Yet, quite a few of my colleagues work hard on finding ways to not interact with undergrads, to not do grading, to not hold office hours. To not teach large classes because they are a ridiculous amount of work (I’ve been advocating for splitting everything into smaller sections, but our enrollments have become insane and we just don’t have the manpower to staff a lot of smaller sections; we’ve been hiring a lot, but people have been retiring a lot, too). When I bring up the importance of teaching and service to the institution, it makes me sounds like a loser because winners do only what they want. Winners spend time on research, and losers like me and the others who actually do nontrivial work for the institution are supposed to pick up the slack that is necessary for the functioning of the department.

I hate the hypocrisy. I hate that we’re all saying one thing (we’re committed to our educational mission!) but doing another (we’re actually only committed to research and fund raising). I hate that bringing it up gets one dismissed as not having one’s priorities straight.

God, sometimes this job sucks. But it still sucks way less than most other jobs, because a few times a week I get to go into the classroom and talk with big kids about physics and math, and for a bit all is right with the world.


4 responses to “Musings on Teaching at a Research School”

  1. I guess our students are fortunate that in our department I’m constantly having to tell new faculty that they can’t care more about students’ grades than they do. So the opposite problem!

  2. I honestly think that education should be more “tiered” and that R1s should be grad only. I see a lot of undergrads making decisions about where to school based on the reputation of the school (a lot of times, the reputation revolves around how certain athletic teams *ahem* football *ahem* are perceived) without putting much thought into the classroom environment. Or they go to the big state school because of tuition costs. However, it becomes pretty clear that they really would rather be at a small school where they can interact with professors who really care about teaching undergrads. It’s as though they don’t realize it’s even an option and there are a lot of good schools out there that are being sucked dry because they can’t sell the “vibe” of the big schools but provide a much better learning environment for undergrads. I think that this would increase enrollment in graduate programs because so many students never even think about graduate school because they’re in these big lectures where no one sits them down and tells them it’s an option. I know a LOT of people who went to grad school because of one-on-one interacts like that, and they wouldn’t have otherwise.

  3. @mareserinitatis “I honestly think that education should be more “tiered” and that R1s should be grad only.”

    Honestly, based, as the kids say.
    I pretty much agree with everything you said.

  4. My salary is paid for 100% from the income I generate from my clinical work (currently). If I do not get an R01 or equivalent grant, I get no compensated non-clinical time and have to work clinically 50-60 hours per week (dependent on how much call I have that week) to make a 1.0 FTE salary. *Technically* I am also paid about $10/hr to teach medical students clinical medicine in the operating room, which I do enjoy – most of the time. I am also required to teach medical students and residents the fundamentals of research in my field which I dislike immensely because 90% of them want publications for as little work as possible, they act like they don’t care, and it costs (much) more time and energy than what I get out of it. My experience with undergrads and medical students from less prestigious institutions is more positive… but also pretty hit or miss. Thus… here we are. 😛

    As a result of all of the above, I have scaled back my teaching to the absolute bare minimum.

Leave a comment