Original post here.
A couple of weeks ago, I took an older colleague to lunch. He’s in a different area so we’d never interacted too much, but to the extent we had, I’d always thought he was pretty cool. Anyway, he’s 70, retiring, and moving cross-country to take up a research-only position elsewhere. I’d missed his farewell party, which is why I took him to lunch.
The colleague is healthy, active, still believes his best work is ahead, and is quite excited about the next step — his zest for work and life is truly inspiring! But a big reason that made me wish I could’ve hung out with him more is that, as it turns out, we have similar personalities, professional values, and modus operandi. It’s been a long time since I’d felt so understood. Most of the time, I feel like a fish out of water among my colleagues, among my scheduled-to-the-gills, calendar-and-list-wielding, networking/schmoozing/grant-savant peers.
As I talked with this older colleague (who btw is very accomplished in his math-heavy field), he articulated the key elements of how he likes to work and they are exactly what I strive for. And it’s amazing that he — likely by being an old white guy — doesn’t seem to think there’s anything wrong with working how he works or prioritizing the things he prioritizes, even though they are not the norm. In contrast, I — likely in no small part because I’m not an old white guy — keep existing in a state of mild anxiety over not fitting here, over not doing things the way they are supposed to be done, over being weird along far too many axes.
A key aspect of the professional MO that came up is leaving room for spontaneity: having enough time that isn’t blocked off by recurrent meetings that you have the flexibility in when you see grad students; being free to go grab lunch or coffee (alas, with whom, when everyone else is so busy and ruled by the calendar? I tried going to lunches and coffees with colleagues in the first year or two on the tenure track, then just gave up); being able to devote large blocks of time to projects that grab you, when they grab you.
As I wrote before, schedules and lists and detailed plans give me hives (see here and here). While it seems that schedules, lists, and detailed plans relax most people by giving them a sense of control, the likes of me (who are apparently fairly rare) find it demotivating and stifling (producing a very real impetus to flee).
We ended up having a very lively two-hour lunch and I left feeling quite cheerful. There’s nothing quite like feeling understood and making a genuine human connection to lift one’s spirits.
I’ve enjoyed revisiting the whole series of posts, thank you! But I’m also wondering if I am the only academic ever who tends S rather than N (ISTJ/P, very much in the middle: either the Psycho Vigilante or the Thought Police). I’m trained to think abstractly but I think my native tendency is observation.
Dame Eleanor Hull: You’re not the only one, for sure. I have two IRL colleagues from my department whom I made take that test and who are both S; one of them is my polar opposite (ESFJ), which I was kind of expecting given how puzzling I find this person, but it was nice to have a personality-type “proof.” S types are more common in the general population, too, so you’re definitely not alone!